The Cue Card

We had a fun time on our bike trip along British Columbia’s Sunshine Coast and Vancouver Island, which ended on Sunday. We had only one day of rain, and enjoyed smooth roads, good company and pretty scenery. If you ever get a chance, bike touring is a great way to see parts of the world. I think I’ve taken at least one multi-day bike adventure each year for the past 15 years now, and it’s always been illuminating and invigorating in some way or another.

I highly recommend it, and you don’t have to be a bike pro to enjoy it either. I am no pro, just a bike riding enthusiast.

On the trip, I finished Kathleen Winter’s 2010 novel “Annabel,” which was discussed at my book club on Tuesday night. It’s another of those excellent reads that I likely wouldn’t have picked on my own. Chalk it up again to a good book club to broaden one’s book horizons. It definitely gets you out of your usual book-selection mold.

“Annabel’s” about an intersex child (born with both male and female genitalia, which is very rare) in 1968 in a small town in remote coastal Labrador. The child’s parents play traditional roles in the town’s hunting culture; the father is a trapper who spends months away in the wilderness and the mother works around the house. The father decides the baby, who undergoes surgery, will be raised as a boy (Wayne), though the mother secretly wishes the child were a daughter (Annabel). The parents don’t tell the child he was born intersex until something happens much later. Eventually Wayne moves away and stops taking his masculinity medications and begins to accept himself as he is.

It’s a novel that explores gender issues and empathizes with seeing beyond male/female-ness to the humanness of a person. It’s a character study into Wayne, his parents, a trusted neighbor, and the culture into how they view and cope with his intersex situation. I was convinced by the realness of the story and the feel of the town in Labrador. His parents surely have their troubles over his ambiguous circumstances but seem to evolve about it with time. I felt for Wayne and just thought he would’ve acted out more sometimes against the circumstances. He seems so calm in the face of the inner and outer turmoil when at times I felt like it might have been good to scream or throw something off a cliff or fight back against a bully.

It’s a very well-written book though and I felt like I was right there in the characters’ shoes so to speak, as they all go through a transformation of sorts. No wonder it was on the short list for both the Orange and Giller prizes. I definitely will look for the author’s next book once it comes out.

Meanwhile, I’ve picked up “The Railway Man” by Eric Lomax about his life during World War II when he was captured by the Japanese Army and forced to work on the Burma-Siam railway. Lomax died in 2012, but his story is now out as a movie with Colin Firth and Nicole Kidman. I plan to see it once I finish the book.

What about you — have you heard or read either of these books? Or what are you keen on reading these days?

Is this book cover cool or what? Kudos to Eric White, its creator. I was lured to this sci-fi novel because of all the good words going on about it on blogs and book sites. It’s been quite the success story. First the author Andy Weir self-published “The Martian” on his website for free in 2012, then he put it on Kindle for 99 cents, and later it was picked up by Crown publisher for six figures and put out again in February of this year. The movie rights for it have already been optioned, and Matt Damon is being rumored for the main role. Wow! Not bad for a first-time author.

Truth be told, I’m not normally a science fiction or space reader, but the synopsis caught my eye. It’s about an astronaut (Mark Watney) whose crew is on a mission on Mars when a violent dust storm hits. Watney’s suit is pierced and he’s flung unconscious out of the crew’s reach. Thinking he’s dead, the others lift off, ending their mission and stranding Watney behind with no way to signal Earth that he’s alive.

Holy smokes, it’s a bleak situation, but Watney’s no quitter. He puts his mind to work on how to survive and reconnect with NASA. And here I thought Robert Redford’s character in the recent movie “All Is Lost” was resourceful, but in that regard Watney leaves him in the dust (so to speak). Watney’s quite the engineer-astronaut-botanist phenomenon. He’s a math-physics nerd but a smart-ass too. He’s got gumption, which apparently doesn’t hurt if you’re left on a totally inhospitable red planet.

“The Martian” drew me in at the start. I absorbed the dire situation as if it were the missing Malaysian airliner whose puzzle needed to be solved. Where in the heck is it? And what would happen to Watney? Being a reader of epic Arctic and Everest survival tales, I pored over this one like a bat out of hell.

Some of the novel takes place on Earth within NASA as they grope with what to do, the other half takes place on Mars as the resourceful Watney tries to overcome his circumstances. It makes for an interesting back and forth.

“The Martian” though is loaded with technical details, which in my opinion gets excessive at times. It’s almost as if the author were adding all the equations and physics suppositions to show how smart he is. On the one hand, it’s great having a lot of scientific details in the novel to make it seem real, but the constant equation set-ups clogged it up at times. In places, it sort of felt like reading a textbook instead of an action thriller. My mind fuzzed over some of the scientific and math thought processes, and the middle of the book sagged for me, as Watney carried out a lot of tests for his proposed rescue plans. No wonder I gave this book to my husband to read first; he’s an engineer he probably liked all these endless details.

But luckily “The Martian” picks up towards the end. And how it all plays out is worth sticking around for. I imagine the movie of it could be quite riveting. Despite the excessive details, I’m still amazed about the author’s knowledge of space and that he made “The Martian” into such a believable tale. It might not be for everybody, but if you’re a nerdy fan of the final frontier and such, you’ll inevitably like this one, too.

I’ve been AWOL for about two weeks from blogging. I went “Divergent” so to speak. I traveled to the Washington, D.C. and the Northern Virginia area for my adult “spring break,” visiting old friends from when I once lived there and seeing some sights. It was a really fun trip. To the left is a photo of the National Gallery of Art, where I saw an interesting exhibit, a portrait of American life, from the photos Garry Winogrand took from the 1950s to his death in 1984. Check out the exhibit if you get a chance.

Then after getting back home our dog Stella became ill and had to go to the emergency vet hospital, which turned our world upside down. After 3 1/2 days of care there, it appears luckily she’s going to be okay to our great relief. She had tested positive for exposure to an antifreeze-type of toxin, which we don’t know exactly where she was exposed to, but we are taking all precautions and have taken our car to get checked for any leaks. We are so fortunate to have her back from what was a life-threatening situation. I think my anxiety went through the roof, but we were very lucky and now she’s back home being her regular Lab self. Oh thank goodness!

I did read “Divergent” while flying back and forth from D.C. Surely, Veronica Roth’s 2011 dystopian young-adult novel made for a good airplane/spring-break-kind-of read, even though I’m typically not a frequent YA reader. It’s got action, suspense, a little love story and an easy reading level. (Maybe too easy?) Am I the last one to have read this bestseller? Probably. I plan to see the movie of it soon, but I haven’t seen it just yet. The movie took in $56 million on its opening weekend, which isn’t too shabby but is nowhere near “The Hunger Games” box-office haul.

If I were to compare the “Divergent” book to “The Hunger Games,” I’d have to say that I found Suzanne Collins’s book better written, but I still enjoyed “Divergent” and found it somewhat similar; they both have 16-year-old protagonists who must undergo enormous physical challenges in a post-apocalyptic world. “Divergent’s” premise though seemed rather hokey to me that people were divided into factions based on their predispositions to Candor, Erudite, Dauntless, Abnegation and Amity. On their way to building a utopia it seems the survivors must have forgotten their heads, believing that by separating people by character would solve society’s problems. (Good luck with that.) But what the heck, I was going to go with it.

The book gets good though when Tris goes off to undergo the initiation process for the Dauntless (brave) faction. The dueling cliques that form between the initiates and the training scenes are some of the best, as Tris jumps in and out of trains, hurls down a wire from the top of the old Sears Tower, and goes through exposure therapy and simulations to try to eradicate fears. The training reminded me a bit of the book “Ender’s Game.” Though along the way Tris falls for her trainer, which isn’t in that one.

And of course, she has a secret and isn’t solely Dauntless. The ending is an action page-turner as the Erudite faction tries to violently take control and Tris is one of the few who can stop them. I look forward to seeing how the movie handles the book. One movie critic I read said the movie is “more satisfying than the bestseller that inspired it.” Could it be true? Have you seen it and what did you think?

On top of “Divergent,” I just finished “The Rosie Project,” which is a romantic comedy that I read for my book club. We are going to discuss it on Tuesday, so I will gather my thoughts about it and write more later. I did mostly enjoy “The Rosie Project” and thought it was clever. It’s about a socially-challenged man’s search for the perfect wife. By the time Rosie comes along she’s so wrong according to his criteria but so right for him regardless. The story’s both funny and charming.

What did you think? Have you read this one?

Well the polar vortex ended last Friday and a glimpse of spring has arrived today in western Canada with 55 degree weather. That translates into Miami temps for this time of year here. We’re loving it for sure!

I’ve been meandering a bit with my reading, but just finished Ann Patchett’s nonfiction book of essays called “This Is the Story of a Happy Marriage,” which came out last November. My sister gave it to me for Christmas. I love the title; it makes you want to know if she’s being real, or if she has some secret cornucopia of knowledge about marriage. I was sure I would devour the collection in no time at all, but I’ve been enjoying it this past week more slowly like a glass of fine wine. I find there seems to be more to absorb in nonfiction and it takes me a bit longer than a novel to get through, generally speaking.

But I liked reading it slowly as it’s a great book and I would highly recommend it, especially to people who are interested in writing, or in the aspects of a writer’s life. It’s quite personal and the combined 22 essays flow together almost as if you were reading a memoir. There’s chapters on just about every facet of Patchett’s life including her childhood and family, how she became a successful writer and co-bookstore owner, her divorce and eventual second marriage, and her life in Nashville. It’s all there: her loves, losses and how writing has always been her mission in life, which she’s worked very hard at doing both as a journalist and as a novelist.

The way she writes these essays it’s almost as if you know her and she’s telling you like she would a friend, candidly and confiding. She’s often funny and self-effacing. The essays are a genuine treat to read, her descriptions and observations reveal truths about life in various episodes. I was lured into them eagerly like a bee to a bonnet. It made me wonder if Patchett’s actually a better nonfiction writer than she is a novelist. This collection made me think so. Granted, I have read just two of her novels so far, one of which “State of Wonder” I liked quite a bit; the other “Run” I didn’t care for that much. But I’d like to read her novel “Bel Canto,” which I’ve heard is her very best.

Meanwhile this nonfiction collection knocked it out of the park for me. I especially appreciated her essay “The Getaway Car,” which gives useful advice if you’re interested in writing, and a candid perspective on being a writer. I also found interesting her foray into becoming a bookstore co-owner, which she writes about in “The Bookstore Strikes Back.” And the title essay “This Is the Story of a Happy Marriage” about the long road to love she found with her second husband is a poignant piece that might remind one that sometimes you don’t realize the really good thing or person you’ve got till they’re (almost) gone.

I enjoyed about all of the essays in this book. She even writes about her very dear dog Rose in “This Dog’s Life” and “Dog Without End,” which made me happy being such a dog lover. I guess only one essay “The Mercies” about the former Catholic nuns who taught her school and befriended her I found a bit convoluted and didn’t draw me in as much as the others. But on the whole, I was quite taken with this volume and will keep it to reread pieces again in the future.

What about you — have you read this book or others by her? Or do you plan to?

Wow is Margaret Atwood’s “Oryx and Crake” from 2003 a wild, dark read. I had been bemoaning the choice of it which a member of my book club selected for us to read this month. I had put it off and put it off till the last possible minute, not wanting to read another dystopian futuristic novel full of gobbledygook and destruction. And the first 200 pages I stayed bemoaning it, but then I latched on to the story and the last 150+ pages flew by quickly. Now I’m looking to read her two others sometime in this trilogy: “The Year of the Flood” (2009) and MaddAddam (2013). So much for bemoaning it; I ended up enjoying its strange imagery and story.

I guess that’s what’s great about a book club; you read selections you might not otherwise read and it broadens your reading scope. I’m glad now to have read “Oryx and Crake” although it’s not necessarily an easy read. It challenges you in ways. It’s often harsh-mouthed and graphic, critical and over-the-top, but that’s Margaret Atwood for you — strong in her convictions, especially concerning science, the environment, and politics.

But how can I explain “Oryx and Crake,” which Atwood disputes as science fiction and calls speculative fiction because she says it doesn’t deal with “things that have not been invented yet.” Set sometime in the future, it’s about a survivor named Snowman (originally named Jimmy) who’s seemingly the last human on Earth after a virulent pandemic strikes the world. He’s left to dodge unfriendly predators and weather conditions and take care of some bioengineered humans his friend Crake once pioneered. He has painful memories of what transpired on Earth and how everyone died.

The narrative shifts back and forth from his present bleak state as a survivor to decades earlier when Earth was populated and Jimmy met his very intelligent friend Crake in grade school in the secured compound where their families lived. The story follows their lives thereafter in college and then getting jobs in corporations and their love for the same girl named Oryx, who they first saw on a porn website. I didn’t say this story would be normal, did I?

It’s a world in which biotech firms like Crake’s are creating super pills and experimenting with genetically engineered humans, and where global warming and overpopulation have taken a severe toll, especially on the pleeblands outside the secured compounds. The narrative leads up to what happened on Earth and the roles Jimmy, Oryx and Crake play. It’s suspenseful in a “Walking Dead” kind of way as the doomsday unfolds.

Although at first I feared the novel would be too dense or strange, I got into after awhile with Snowman (Jimmy) as the narrator. It turned out not to be too hard to understand or wacko. Its underlying message of the destructive direction our society is headed gets a bit heavy at times but not so far-fetched as not to be believed. Who’s not to say humans will hasten their own demise.

Apparently Atwood was in the midst of writing “Oryx and Crake” around the time of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, which made her stop for a few weeks. No wonder: its negative scope. By the end though I was entangled in its web and left wanting to find out more in book two. I’m sure “Oryx and Crake” will make for an interesting discussion for my book club this Tuesday evening.

How about you — have you read this novel or any of this trilogy? And what did you think?

Yes, I finally got on the ball and read John Green’s 2012 young adult blockbuster “The Fault in Our Stars.” I’m probably one of the last in blogger-land to have done so, and it came at a good time when I needed a quick, easy read after some of the denseness of the last novel I read and another dense one for my book club to follow.

And yes, I’m in the majority when I say I really liked “The Fault in Our Stars” and it’s a wonderful, stunning read. Even though it’s sad about two high school kids who have cancer who meet at a support group and fall in love, it’s also very beautiful and moving without being overly sentimental. Author John Green captures the teenagers and their dialogue seemingly to perfection. And the characters, Hazel and Augustus, express plenty of sardonic wit and intelligence to keep the story from falling into a depressing or cheesy hole. Green brings these characters to life and I really felt they were real people by the end who I knew and would miss.

“The Fault in Our Stars” is a book about living and dying and questioning whether one has meaning. It makes you feel what it’s like to be in a cancer kids’ shoes but it also gives them dignity and humanness too. I also liked the book’s side plot of Hazel’s quest to try to contact the author of her favorite book to find out what happened to its characters after an ambiguous ending. The quest takes Hazel and Augustus on a whirlwind adventure to Amsterdam where their connection blossoms.

I rarely read young adult novels but this one was really worth it, even though a tissue or two was required. It’s hard to really say too much about the story, other than to just rush out get the book and read it, which you must if you haven’t already. It’s made me want to read all of John Green’s other novels, too. I’m a convert now to his talent.

And I’m already thinking of the movie adaptation of “The Fault in Our Stars,” which comes out June 6. I’ve seen the trailer and I’m a bit worried it won’t be able to capture the right tone without being cheesy or fake-ish like the book does. Uh-oh. Will it live up to the book? Will the actors meet the expectations for the characters? The odds are against it, but I’ll likely see it anyways. It’s quite amazing that Shailene Woodley will play the lead roles for both upcoming movies “Divergent” and “Fault in Our Stars.” Wow she’s on a roll. I thought she was quite good in the 2011 movie “The Descendants,” so we will see if she can rise to these roles as well.

What about you — what did you think of this novel and do you plan to see the movie?